Hi all, I copied it from the negotiate.c In other places like ntlm.c, its like that only. Im not the one who actually designed secur32 ;) :P If i did anything worng please correct me. bye, Vijay On 2/15/06, Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:22:09PM +0100, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 17:34 +0530 schrieb Vijay Kiran Kamuju:
Add InitializeSecurityContext for schannel in secur32.dll
+static SECURITY_STATUS SEC_ENTRY schan_InitializeSecurityContextW( + PCredHandle phCredential, PCtxtHandle phContext, SEC_WCHAR *pszTargetName, + ULONG fContextReq, ULONG Reserved1, ULONG TargetDataRep, + PSecBufferDesc pInput,ULONG Reserved2, PCtxtHandle phNewContext, + PSecBufferDesc pOutput, ULONG *pfContextAttr, PTimeStamp ptsExpiry) +{
I Remembered a statement from fefe (diet-libc => www.fefe.de) about "Writing Small and Fast Software":
It is still clear, what each Argument does, when you remove the Variable-Names from the Declaration? - Yes: Efficient Design. - No: Your Interface is to generic == bloated
static SECURITY_STATUS SEC_ENTRY schan_InitializeSecurityContextW( PCredHandle, PCtxtHandle, SEC_WCHAR *, ULONG, ULONG, ULONG, PSecBufferDesc, ULONG, PCtxtHandle, PSecBufferDesc, ULONG, PTimeStamp) {
We all should thank the People who did such a Design :-)
However, this only works in newer C compilers as far as I know... ;)
Ciao, Marcus