On Tuesday 19 November 2002 12:09 pm, Vincent Béron wrote:
Greg Turner a écrit:
Actually, I have similar questions about the programs and dlls trees of wine... for example, Alexandre has requested that I remove #ifdef's from rpcss... but can I safely code against the assumption that defined(NO_NAMELESS_STRUCT)? The answer (or, more precisely, the ability to answer for myself without bothering you all about it) lies in knowing what the "officially" supported usage scenarios for the rpcss code are... but I'm not sure I do.
DEFS = @DLLFLAGS@ -DSTRICT -DNONAMELESSUNION -DNONAMELESSSTRUCT $(EXTRADEFS)
in Makeprogs.rules.in should answer one of your questions.
Vincent
that is clear, indeed, but what I don't know is, should I be worried that somebody is compiling, say, under MSVC, completely outside of the control of the wine configure/make, where, in fact, !defined(NONAMELESSSTRUCT) && !defined(NONAMELESSUNION)...? -- gmt "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight; nothing he cares about more than his own personal safety; is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better persons than himself." -- John Stuart Mill