24 Jun
2009
24 Jun
'09
8:16 a.m.
Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> writes:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: [...]
Furthermore, - the "65001" should probably be replaced by "utf8" (I checked in tools/wrc/parser.l:373) [ which would be better IMNSHO in new/updated resource file]
Do the Windows/Mingw resource compilers support utf8 there?
No, that's why using 65001 is preferable. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org