22 Aug
2018
22 Aug
'18
2:09 p.m.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:00 AM Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> wrote:
+ for (bit_off = 0; bit_off < 8; bit_off++, mask >>= 1, src += 4) + { + if (src[3] != 0xff && x + bit_off < bmi_width) + *dst_byte |= mask; + }
Does this mean that only fully transparent pixels are added to the mask? If so, why not include any pixel that is more than 50% transparent? -Alex