1 Nov
2002
1 Nov
'02
1 a.m.
Ove Kaaven <ovehk(a)ping.uio.no> writes:
IDL-generated files would also eventually obsolete all the current wine/obj_*.h files, but those obj_* files seem to be somewhat more logically structured than MS's own IDL files, should we craft Wine's IDL files accordingly, and maybe have some top-level .idl files in include/ and some sub-.idl files under include/wine/, like it's done now in e.g. objidl.h?
No, I think we should follow the Microsoft way. Sure it's a mess, but so is the rest of the API anyway... And every time we tried to do things better than Microsoft we ended up having to revert it. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com