24 Feb
2010
24 Feb
'10
11:12 a.m.
On 24 February 2010 11:06, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
Reece Dunn <msclrhd(a)googlemail.com> writes:
NOTE: A check for integer overflow would be `position.low + move.low < position.low`, but there are no current tests to say if integer overflow is handled (and how it is handled) here in the tests. Therefore, the simplest implementation is just to remove the previous check.
It may be the simplest, but the right way is to add such a test and figure out the appropriate behavior.
Will do -- that was next on my things to do. Do I need to do that first before this change, or after it? - Reece