Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.de> writes:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:00:30AM -0500, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:55:42 -0500 Jeremy White <jwhite(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
Alright folks, I have to confess that the 1.6 release came and I didn't immediately get up and dance.
In fact, a new Wine release was almost...boring.
What was most striking to me about this release was the fact that not a single bug was targeted to be fixed for 1.6. The practice of nominating bugs for specific milestones seems to have been abandoned. I can't help but wonder why.
Either we are good :)
Or we should have reminded and called for this kind of tagging and bug squashing work.
I think working from the regressions list is more productive (and we have made some good progress there). -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org