Re: Quick and dirty testcases for MS-DOS API?

[Dan Kegel]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> wrote:
> > Compiling DOS code to a .com file will produce a very small
> > executable, then embedding it into the test, put it in %TEMP%,
> > and exec should be trivial. No need for external tools IMO.
>
> I thought of that, it's tempting.
>
> But nasm is pretty common; I don't know that it would
> really be a burden to use it.  And it would help testcase
> readability.

and/or maintainability.   Nobody likes having binary blobs
next to the source code they supposedly came from.