Re: [PATCH 1/8] wsdapi: Use slim reader/writer lock instead of critical section.

[Owen Rudge]

On 13/09/2018 15:24, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> I haven't looked at the rest of the series, but is this functionally
> necessary? Given that SRW locks will provide worse performance on Wine
> than critical sections. Although I think SRW locks can be made to use
> futexes internally too...

Thanks for picking up on this - it looks like, upon reflection, it 
shouldn't be required. The initial issue arose due to the lack of 
duplicate message filtering.

I'll resubmit the patches and drop this one.

Thanks,

Owen