12 Jan
2012
12 Jan
'12
5:10 p.m.
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes:
Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
Is there that kind of problem in the new tests?
No but if the tests didn't catch that problem it's probably a sign that they are not extensive enough.
New tests exercising any desirable behaviour could be added at any point, it never was a reason to reject a test case before. If there is a need for some specific test it's usually enough to suggest what you'd like to see tested.
I didn't reject the test case. It's just pending until you get the code right, which may require revisiting the tests. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org