8 Apr
2009
8 Apr
'09
6:21 p.m.
Luke Benstead <kazade(a)gmail.com> writes:
That sounds like a far better way of doing it. Perhaps though, if that method was implemented, passing a program path directly into wine (wine ~/foo.exe) would be a special case (without a \\?\ prefix). From a users point of view that's what I'd expect, as you haven't yet started the application (and entered windows land :) ).
Yes, that's my point, the functionality has to be preserved as far as possible (and not just for the program name). So the heuristic essentially needs to be moved to higher-level functions, which would then in turn call the lower-level code with an explicit \\?\unix prefix. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org