Re: RtlAtom tests improved

[Eric Pouech]

György 'Nog' Jeney wrote:
> > I figured out that the RtlCreateAtomTable function as expecting to get
> > passed in a NULL as the initial Table, otherwise it thinks that the
> > argument is a valid atom table and just returns success.  This
> > unfourtuneatly makes the test
> > results that Dimitrie send useless because RtlCreateAtomTable thought
>
> ^^^^^^^^
> I realy did mean Dimitry.
> didn't you actually mean Dmitry ? ;-)

A+
-- 
Eric Pouech