24 Sep
2008
24 Sep
'08
10:30 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM, James Hawkins <jhawkins(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
Hi,
Changelog: * Fix a failing test in win95.
dlls/secur32/tests/main.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
-- James Hawkins
But if the result is SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION it's not broken is it? Shouldn't we use some kind of skip here? (The end result will be the same, as we should use win_skip, it just doesn't look correct). Cheers, Paul.