Re: Purist keyword?

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I see quite a few people filing bugs that are only exposed when bundled
> native dlls are removed. I think it would be good to be able to group these
> bugs, perhaps with a 'purist' keyword. Anyone opposed?

Personally I don't see the point. The less keywords is the better IMO. Why not
clarify the problem in the subject, like "xxx doesn't install without native
yyy.dll" ?

-- 
Dmitry.