Re: rsaenh: add support for mandatory parameters to RSAENH_CPGetProvParam

[Alexandre Julliard]

Mounir IDRASSI <mounir.idrassi(a)idrix.fr> writes:
> Hi Alexandre,
> The problem comes from the file cert.c in crypt32 dll (the real one, not
> the one in tests): at line 1976, the value AT_SIGNATURE is hardcoded in
> case for failure of CryptGetProvParam. Without my patch, this function
> definitely fail and the hardcoded value is written. So, a more complete
> patch would include also a correction to this file.
> Question: can a patch include corrections to different dlls? I can
> submit it now.

It's better to send separate patches for separate dlls.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org