On 08/07/15 10:35, Piotr Caban wrote:
Hi Iván,
On 07/07/15 21:00, Iván Matellanes wrote:
+ /* locking */ + ios_obj.do_lock = 1; + p_ios_clrlock(&ios_obj); + ok(ios_obj.do_lock == 1, "expected 1 got %d\n", ios_obj.do_lock); + ios_obj.do_lock = 0; + p_ios_clrlock(&ios_obj); + ok(ios_obj.do_lock == 1, "expected 1 got %d\n", ios_obj.do_lock); + p_ios_setlock(&ios_obj); + ok(ios_obj.do_lock == 0, "expected 0 got %d\n", ios_obj.do_lock); + ios_obj.do_lock = -1; + p_ios_setlock(&ios_obj); + ok(ios_obj.do_lock == -2, "expected -2 got %d\n", ios_obj.do_lock); Please add a test that shows what happens with this->sb->do_lock value when ios_setlock and ios_clrlock are called (it should also be updated). Sure! Thanks for catching this.
Iván