I noticed that��Alexandre��committed a patch that forwards the api-ms dlls to��kernelbase instead of advapi32. When I was working on this patch, I also noticed that these functions in the api-ms dlls are indeed forwarded to kernelbase, but I didn't say anything because all the other functions were also forwarded to��advapi32. I'm just wondering if maybe I should have said something about it. Going forward, should I raise questions when I notice discrepancies like these?