Re: base addresses of kernel32

[Vitaliy Margolen]

On 07/04/2010 12:08 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > kernel32 is also loaded to the same base address.
> > Is there a good reason for this?  Otherwise, this opens a security
> > vulnerability in Wine that does not exist in Windows....
> > Yes, safedisk.

Vitaliy