Re: some ismbc* functions: third try

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Greg Turner" <gmturner007(a)ameritech.net> wrote:
> totally untested, but it does compile, and seems logical
> enough.  while i was at it, i added a few more.

Probably it would be better to create a common internal
function which accepts C1_???? flags, does all remaining
common operations with converting character(s) to unicode
and returns (ctype & flags) != 0?

-- 
Dmitry.