31 Dec
2008
31 Dec
'08
12:14 p.m.
Gerald Pfeifer <gerald(a)pfeifer.com> writes:
The current version likely is actually broken since the ! operator has a higher priority than bitwise & in C. Unless someone really wanted to use a very, hmm, unusual construct here?
No, it's clearly not intended, but fixing this breaks the tests, this would need to be addressed first. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org