1 May
2003
1 May
'03
5:02 p.m.
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> writes:
If we do this (which is great, yay!), why not rename it to wine_pp or wine_cpp for consistency with the other libs? We don't need to rename the libs/wpp dir, but what about the library itself?
I considered doing that, but since all the functions are named wpp_something it seemed preferable to stick to the current name. It's only an internal library anyway so it's not really a problem to not have the full wine prefix. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com