5 May
2003
5 May
'03
6:01 p.m.
Ove Kaaven <ovek(a)arcticnet.no> writes:
Hmm. That could be solved by making the try block a nested function too, but I suppose that would bring some overhead...
Even ignoring the overhead, I can't think of a way to declare that function with the right return type. But maybe I missed something... -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com