Re: [PATCH] ws2_32: Trace status on operation failure.

[Paul Gofman]

On 2/9/22 20:12, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> On 2/9/22 11:10, Paul Gofman wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Gofman <pgofman(a)codeweavers.com>
> > ---
> >       Supersedes 226140.
> >
> >       v2:
> >            - use TRACE instead of WARN.
> >
> >   dlls/ws2_32/socket.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> If we're going to just TRACE always, is there any point in guarding it 
> to only print on failure?

Probably not.