Re: [PATCH 3/3] configure: Use 0 instead of NULL because NULL isn't defined.

[Michael Stefaniuc]

Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.com> writes:
> > Actually it's not a cast. It's a heuristic that the compiler has to make
> > to detect a NULL pointer. The best heuristic for this is (char *) 0.
> > Duh ... that should have been (void *) 0.
> There's no heuristic involved here, the assignment is clearly to a
> pointer, and 0 is a perfectly valid null pointer, no cast is needed.
> I was talking more in general and not about this concrete case here.
> Both "0" and "(void *) 0" work here; which to use is a matter of style
> and thus good for a flame war. But i don't care too much to start one ;)

bye
	michael
-- 
Michael Stefaniuc               Tel.: [phone]
Sr. Network Engineer            Fax.: [phone]