On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:51 PM, James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/24/08, wine-bugs(a)winehq.org <wine-bugs(a)winehq.org> wrote:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9484
--- Comment #9 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-03-24 12:43:54 --- Can anyone test this in wine 0.9.58? Some other copy protections are working better, and if this isn't working yet, we might want to delay it to wine 1.2...
What's the point of having a blocker list if we keep deferring those bugs? Granted not every bug in the list deserves a spot, but we need to knuckle down and get these bugs fixed. When we get closer to the release date, we can get a better idea of which bugs are not feasible to fix before the release. Until that point, this bug list needs to receive top priority.
-- James Hawkins
I was going through a few of the 1.0 bugs that haven't been tested in a while. Since it has no demo, I can't personally test it, and was trying to see if any progress has been made in the past few months (as has been with SafeDisc). While it is certainly hard to tell if it can be fixed by 1.0, having someone test it and see how much closer we are to fixing it is the first step in figuring that out.
No objection there. My point about deferring bugs stands though. -- James Hawkins