27 Oct
2010
27 Oct
'10
7:14 p.m.
"Vincent Povirk" <vincent(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
There is another minor problem highlighted by this test, which is that I can make up any path and end up with a loaded dll, as long as there's a builtin dll filename at the end.
That's a feature, the idea is that builtin dlls are independent from the actual dll files. That's also why asking for the path name of a builtin doesn't make sense. This could conceivably be changed now that we have the fake dlls mechanism, but it would be a pretty fundamental redesign. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org