14 Apr
2019
14 Apr
'19
4:03 p.m.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 4:44 PM Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sure, but I guess we've already lost since we're requiring ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (as in that bug), which was added to core in the same version. Unless of course there's any plan to relax that requirement?
We also accept EXT_polygon_offset_clamp. I'm not sure but it might be not that much worse in practice to also require ARB_pipeline_statistics_query. AFAIK, there are no plans to relax that requirement.