14 May
2004
14 May
'04
6:06 p.m.
Mike Hearn <mh(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
How does it not scale? Surely copying code is worse from a scalability perspective?
It doesn't scale because if you have n dlls you potentially need n^2 static libraries to share code. Obviously we won't need all the combinations, but even a small fraction of that is going to create a big mess. It needs a *very* good reason to create a new library, and if it's just for sharing a couple of structure dumping functions it's not worth it. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org