27 Oct
2004
27 Oct
'04
11:44 p.m.
Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> writes:
Looks good to me, Michael, though I'd suggest using /dev/random rather than /dev/urandom: the blocking behavior of the former shouldn't be a problem for Wine (since this DLL makes no timing guarantees anyway).
That doesn't mean we want to block, especially for things like CPGenRandom that don't require the highest quality randomness. I think in general /dev/urandom is a much better choice. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org