26 Jun
2013
26 Jun
'13
7:10 a.m.
On 26 June 2013 03:53, Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
My understanding was that using the _WIN64 macro was preferred. I can certainly do that instead. How's this?
I could probably live with that, though perhaps make it a helper function, and I'm not entirely sure this will print something meaningful on e.g. ARM. This is really a winex11 patch though, so it's more something for Alexandre.