2 Jul
2003
2 Jul
'03
1:30 a.m.
Mike Hearn <m.hearn(a)signal.qinetiq.com> writes:
However, I think it unbreaks InstallShield, which is a fantastically common application. It might be a case of a "lesser of two evils" decision.
No it's a "correct vs. wrong" decision. The existing code is correct and there's no reason to break it, even if doing that happens to mask another bug. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com