12 Jul
2015
12 Jul
'15
7:18 a.m.
Am 12.07.2015 um 13:38 schrieb Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta(a)gmail.com>:
Actually I should make it return struct d3drm_device **, as you suggested in the patchset mails at wine-devel, Right, I forgot.
but I think I should implement the first option and then do the return d3drm_device ** part in a seperate patch right before sending the implementation patches (as this is called from multiple functions). What do you think? Ya, change the return value in a separate patch, and for now use QueryInterface to return the requested interface version.