17 Jun
2005
17 Jun
'05
4:55 p.m.
James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> writes:
There isn't an RtlCopyAcl in ntdll, but it simplifies the code a bit and can be useful in other places. For one I should've taken out the [NTDLL.@] because we don't export it, but should the function be named something else?
Yes, it should be named something like copy_acl to make it clear it's an internal function, and it should definitely not be declared in an exported header. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org