On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Rico Sch��ller <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:kgbricola@web.de" target="_blank">kgbricola@web.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

On 05.04.2013 09:13, Nozomi Kodama wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
�� �� �� s = 0.75f;<br>
- �� ��if ( order &gt; 2 )<br>
- �� �� �� ��s += 5.0f / 16.0f;<br>
- �� ��if ( order &gt; 4 )<br>
- �� �� �� ��s -= 3.0f / 32.0f;<br>
+ �� ��if (order &gt; 2)<br>
+ �� �� �� ��s = 1.0625f;<br>
+ �� ��if (order &gt; 4)<br>
+ �� �� �� ��s = 0.96875f;<br>
�� �� �� s /= D3DX_PI;<br>
</blockquote>
<br>��Doesn&#39;t the compiler do that already?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Most likely,since those are literal constants.</div><div>Besides, 5.0f / 16.0f is more readable than a pre-computed result.</div><div><br></div>

<div>So I don&#39;t think this patch is really useful.</div><div><br></div><div>Fr��d��ric</div>