20 Nov
2002
20 Nov
'02
2:36 a.m.
Greg Turner <gmturner007(a)ameritech.net> writes:
Still hoping for some guidance on this. I'm happy to get rid of atomicity.c as you suggest, but less happy about duplicating the (to be renamed) named_pipe_kludge_client.c unit. The prospect of keeping two identical units in sync just rubs me the wrong way... it's so blatantly non-orthagonal --- it seems, to me, that there must be a better way.
Do you really need the client connection stuff in rpcss? As far as I can tell it doesn't really do much, I'd suggest getting rid of it somehow, and having the client part only in rpcrt4 and the server part only in rpcss. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com