Re: [PATCH] server: if a debugger is attached to a process, child processes shouldn't get debugged (resend)

[David Laight]

On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:32:27PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 11:44:24AM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > Bernhard Loos <bernhardloos(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > +    int                  debug_childs:1;  /* also debug all child processes */
> >
> > 'debug_children' would be a better name.
>
> also
>   unsigned int	foo:1;
> please. (int foo:1 works, but is semidefined only ;)

Why the bitfield anyway?
Unless you are allocating a lot of copies of the structure
it is likely to generate more code than the saved memory.

	David

-- 
David Laight: david(a)l8s.co.uk