18 Sep
2009
18 Sep
'09
12:09 p.m.
On 09/18/2009 01:42 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hi,
as I was encouraged to resent the patch from last week in git format I hope it will be better this time.
Best regards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Markus, After reading this patch again, it seems to me it's not a 100% correct. There is a slight difference in passing hdcSrc as NULL compared to retrieving dcSrc via get_dc_ptr. The actual test sets hdcSrc to NULL, so the corresponding test in the implementation should be: if (!hdcSrc) return FALSE; dcSrc = get_dc_ptr ( hdcSrc ); Now, I don't know whether get_dc_ptr can fail but that's a different matter. -- Cheers, Paul.