"Evan Stade" <estade(a)gmail.com> writes:
+static const path_test_t polydraw_path[] = { + {0, 0, 6, 0, 0}, /*0*/ + {10, 10, 2, 0, 0}, /*1*/ + {10, 15, 3, 0, 0}, /*2*/ + {100, 100, 6, 0, 0}, /*3*/ + {95, 95, 2, 0, 0}, /*4*/ + {10, 10, 2, 0, 0}, /*5*/ + {10, 15, 3, 0, 0}, /*6*/ + {100, 100, 6, 0, 1}, /*7*/ + {15, 15, 2, 0, 1}, /*8*/ + {100, 100, 6, 0, 1}, /*9*/ + {30, 30, 4, 0, 1}, /*10*/ + {30, 35, 4, 0, 1}, /*11*/ + {35, 35, 4, 0, 1}, /*12*/ + {45, 50, 2, 0, 0}, /*13*/ + {35, 35, 6, 0, 0}, /*14*/ + {50, 55, 2, 0, 0}, /*15*/ + {45, 50, 2, 0, 0}, /*16*/ + {35, 35, 6, 0, 0}, /*17*/ + {60, 60, 2, 0, 0}, /*18*/ + {60, 65, 2, 0, 0}, /*19*/ + };
You still need to use symbolic constants here, like Misha suggested. Note: you shouldn't wait for me to tell you that, the point of a public review is that everybody can comment on a patch, and you are expected to take these comments into account. In fact if I see that someone has commented on a patch already, usually I don't bother to review it, I just wait for you to resubmit an improved version. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org