12 Apr
2016
12 Apr
'16
9:18 a.m.
On 12 April 2016 at 16:16, Paul Gofman <gofmanp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I had a quick a look and actually lot of functions are OK in this sense, though still many Vec3 functions has the same problem. I can deal with them after this one. Should I resend the patch with the different title?
I think it's fine, but it's up to Matteo.