Luck <tony.luck(a)intel.com> From: hpa(a)zytor.com Message-ID: <C4474E45-EAE0-45D3-8DB1-78AA1C2548A8(a)zytor.com> On February 24, 2017 11:36:19 AM PST, Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon(a)linux.intel.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 11:11 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
In a previous version Andy Lutomirsky suggested that if (user_mode(regs) && (fixup_umip_exception(regs) == 0))
was easier to read :). Although at the time fixup_umip_exception returned a numeric value. Now it only returns true/false for successful/failed emulation. If with true/false not comparing to true makes it easier to read, I will make the change.
I think == true is silly :)
Then I'll make the change.
Thanks and BR, Ricardo
It's worse than silly, it is potentially toxic. true is a macro which it's defined as 1. Thus foo == true ... doesn't actually mean what people *think* it does, which is roughly the same thing as !!foo However, if foo is not a boolean, this is *very* different; consider if foo is 2. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.