26 Apr
2012
26 Apr
'12
10:54 p.m.
Roland McGrath <roland(a)hack.frob.com> wrote:
I've no particular attachment to the name 'xstat'. If you'd prefer 'statx' I could go for that.
I prefer something other than xstat and statx(at) seems acceptable enough. What I'd really prefer is a name that is less meaninglessly arcane, but I haven't thought of any good ones.
fileinfoat() perhaps? I think stat*at() is better, though, as people are used to the stat function family. David