Re: Quick and dirty testcases for MS-DOS API?

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Dan Kegel" <dank(a)kegel.com> wrote:
> > > Compiling DOS code to a .com file will produce a very small
> > > executable, then embedding it into the test, put it in %TEMP%,
> > > and exec should be trivial. No need for external tools IMO.
> >
> > I thought of that, it's tempting.
> >
> > But nasm is pretty common; I don't know that it would
> > really be a burden to use it.  And it would help testcase
> > readability.
>
> and/or maintainability.   Nobody likes having binary blobs
> next to the source code they supposedly came from.

The exception tests in ntdll is a nice example how to do that
without hurting readability and maintainability.

-- 
Dmitry.