-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 14 May 2004 20:06, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mike Hearn <mh(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
How does it not scale? Surely copying code is worse from a scalability perspective?
It doesn't scale because if you have n dlls you potentially need n^2 static libraries to share code. Obviously we won't need all the combinations, but even a small fraction of that is going to create a big mess. It needs a *very* good reason to create a new library, and if it's just for sharing a couple of structure dumping functions it's not worth it.
You are right, but it this case i will copy this 2 sources for 5-6 dlls :( Regards, Raphael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFApR+cp7NA3AmQTU4RAm5QAJ9k3a/hp9Gi0nSgAn4Vsp4fsInJJwCeImbT lBi1Erm1S5Ey0/e8wOwfOkE= =6BBC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----