18 May
2007
18 May
'07
12:12 p.m.
Chris Robinson wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 04:01:19 am Robert Shearman wrote:
+ ULONGLONG llret = (ULONGLONG)a + b; + if ((sizeof(SIZE_T) < sizeof(ULONGLONG)) && (llret > 0xffffffff)) + return FALSE;
WOuldn't this be more correct (as well as function when sizeof(SIZE_T) >= sizeof(ULONGLONG)):
SIZE_T res = a + b; return (res >= a);
An example that would break using your logic: 2 + (-1) -- Rob Shearman