Re: 'wrc' weirdness

[Stefan Dösinger]

> Am 15.07.2022 um 18:49 schrieb Gisle Vanem <gvanem(a)online.no>:
>
> Why not support '-nologo' to ease the switching between
> 'rc' and 'wrc'? And I feel 'wrc' is way more solid program
> than 'rc' is. I've yet to see 'wrc' crash in bad input (like
> 'rc' often does).

Submit a merge request :-)

I think command line tool compatibility is a worthy thing. I guess you mean that currently wrc returns an error when -nologo is passed?