Re: ntdll: Revert 33b0f0edffa0c8a06b4ee8831c92fdc373f83ece.

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
> The test requires a PE binary because obviously we can't test PE
> protections on Unix binaries. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Just
> build a crosstest:
>
> $ wine ntdll_crosstest.exe info.c
> info.c:1296: Test failed: mbi.Protect is 0x8, expected 0x4

The test above this one accepts both PAGE_READWRITE and PAGE_WRITECOPY (why?),
shouldn't the failing test accept both values for consistency then?

-- 
Dmitry.