12 Mar
2017
12 Mar
'17
7:41 p.m.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, Sebastian Lackner wrote: [...]
Ugh... actually it looks like we have a summary line hardcoded in schedsvc tests:
The TestBot still recognizes test summary lines that don't have a process id and will continue to do so for a good while for backward compatibility. So there is no issue here: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=29473&log_202=1#k202 I'm still sending a patch so the line matches modern expectations: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=29474 -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com>