Re: I/O Completion Ports Implementation

[Alexandre Julliard]

Robert Shearman <R.J.Shearman(a)warwick.ac.uk> writes:
> This has been hanging around in my tree for a while. This is useful for RPC 
> and for eventually implementing QueueUserWorkItem.
>
> Changelog:
> Implement I/O completion ports

You should use the normal waiting mechanisms, instead of creating a
new type of waiting request which requires exporting a bunch of
private functions. This means there should be only a single
remove_io_completion request, and the wait should be done with a
standard WaitForSingleObject.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.com