Re: [1/6] internal cursor / icon memory layout change

[H. Verbeet]

On 19/04/06, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
> That's quite ugly, and it will break any app that depends on the
> cursor format, which is the only reason we are storing them in a
> memory block in the first place.
> How is that supposed to work? Calling GlobalLock16 or GlobalLock on a
> cursor handle doesn't seem to work very well on win2k.

Anyway, any suggestions on how to implement this in a cleaner way?