24 Jul
2012
24 Jul
'12
10:07 a.m.
On 07/20/12 19:32, Dan Kegel wrote:
I have not tested at all on 64 bits, and am only guessing on the calling convention stuff. The calling convention is correct. The class name is _Container_base0 (not _Container_base).
I can't say anything about the implementation. I don't know what this class is supposed to do.